In the course of researching and preparing my latest report, I have grown not only in my understanding of law, but in my understanding of why these laws exist. Legal literacy is only one responsibility of leadership. True leadership also requires cognitive empathy, an understanding what others endure, and emotional empathy, recognizing how institutional decisions affect human lives.
General Municipal Law §207-a, §207-c, and the Americans with Disabilities Act do not operate as discretionary policy tools; they impose mandatory obligations grounded in medical evidence and due process.
When medical determinations are made administratively without engaging treating physicians, independent medical evaluation, or reasonable accommodation analysis, the law is no longer being applied; it is being replaced. In such circumstances, the role of administrator shifts from legal steward to de facto medical arbiter, a function outside professional qualification and statutory authority.
The result is not merely an individual denial of care, but a systemic erosion of enforceability. If protections enacted by law can be nullified through administrative convenience, then the legal framework intended to safeguard injured public safety workers becomes functionally hollow.
Statutes such as Civil Service Law §75, General Municipal Law §207-a, and the Americans with Disabilities Act are not merely procedural frameworks. They are moral instruments codified into law. They exist because history has shown what happens when injured, vulnerable, or inconvenient people are left at the mercy of unchecked authority.
To understand the letter of the law without understanding its purpose is to miss the role of leadership entirely. The protections embedded in these statutes are not obstacles to governance; they are the ethical boundary between authority and harm.
Semper Fidelis-Dan
Add comment
Comments